Search More

Sunday, November 14, 2010

McDonald's and PepsiCo to help write UK health policy (wew)



Department of Health putting fast food companies at heart of policy on obesity, alcohol and diet-related disease


the Department of Health is definitely putting the fast meal companies McDonald's and KFC and processed drink and food manufacturers such as PepsiCo, Kellogg's, Unilever, Mars and Diageo in the centre of writing government protection plan on obesity, alcohol in addition to diet-related disease, the protector has learned.

In an overhaul of public wellbeing, said by campaign groups to be the same as handing smoking policy onto the tobacco industry, health secretary Andrew Lansley has developed five "responsibility deal" companies with business, co-chaired simply by ministers, to come " up " with policies. Some these are expected to be included in the public health white paper due inside the next month.

The groups are dominated by nutrition and alcohol industry people, who have been invited to suggest measures to be able to tackle public health downturn. Working alongside them tend to be public interest health along with consumer groups including which?,Cancer Research UK along with the Faculty of Public health. The alcohol responsibility offer network is chaired by head of the lobby team the Wine and heart Trade Association. The food network to be able to tackle diet and illnesses includes processed food manufacturers, fast food companies, and also Compass, the catering company famously pilloried by Jamie Oliver because of its school menus of egypr twizzlers. The food deal's sub-group at calories is chaired by means of PepsiCo, owner of Walkers crisps.

the class leading supermarkets are an each strong presence, while the responsibility deal's training group is chaired by Fitness Industry Association, which is the lobby group intended for private gyms and fitness instructors.

In early meetings, these commercial partners happen to be invited to draft priorities and identify barriers, including EU legislation, that they would like removed. They have been assured by Lansley that he desires to explore voluntary not regulating approaches, and to service them in removing hurdles. Using the pricing connected with food or alcohol to change consumption continues to be ruled out. One group was told the fact that health department did not desire to lead, but rather hear through its members what really should be done.

Professor Sir Ian Gilmore, the best liver specialist and until recently president on the Royal College of professionals, said he was very concerned by emphasis on voluntary partnerships with industry. A member belonging to the alcohol responsibility deal community, Gilmore said he had decided to co-operate, but he doubted whether there will probably be "a meaningful convergence concerning the interests of business and public health considering that priority of the drinks industry was in making money for shareholders although public health demanded a cut in consumption".

he / she said: "On alcohol there exists undoubtedly a need pertaining to regulation on price, availability and marketing and there's a risk that discussions shall be deflected away from regulation that may very well be effective but would have an effect on sales. On food labelling we certainly have listened too much into the supermarkets rather than looking for traffic lights [warnings] which usually health experts recommend. " Employers are being asked to take with more responsibility for employees within a fourth health at perform deal. The fifth network is charged with modifying behaviour, and is chaired by National Heart Forum. This group is likely to be working with the innovative Cabinet Office behavioural insight unit, which is exploring options for making people change their own behaviour without new guidelines.

Lansley's public health reforms are seen as a test case for wider Conservative coverage on replacing state treatment with private and company action.

While public interest groups are doing drawing up the opportunities, many have argued of which robust regulation is needed to manage junk food and booze misuse.

The Faculty associated with Public Health, represented on some the deal networks, has feedback a ban on trans weight and minimum alcohol pricing. Professor Lindsey Davies, FPH us president, said: "We are hopeful that engaging with all the food industry will lead to changes in the quality and healthiness belonging to the products we and your children eat. It can be done to make progress on issues for instance salt reduction through voluntary agreements, and we're keeping a great open mind until all of us see what comes right out the meetings, but we take into account that there is continue to a role for regulation. "

Responding to criticism this industry was too prominent while in the plans, the Department involving Health said: "We are constantly in touch with expert bodies, including those within the public health field, to help you inform all our work. For the forthcoming criminal court health white paper we've engaged an array of people, as we can also be doing to help people develop the responsibility package drawn from business, the actual voluntary sector, other non-governmental companies, local government, as well as public health body frames. A diverse range of experts will also be involved. "

He added that this government wanted to develop public health through voluntary agreements with business and also other partners, rather than through rules or top-down lectures as it believed this approach will be far more effective plus ambitious than previous work.

An over-arching board, chaired through Lansley, has been create to oversee the work from the five responsibility deal systems, with representatives of local government along with a regional health director – but it surely too is dominated by food, alcohol, advertising along with retail industries. Gilmore feedback a better balance of commercial interests and separate experts on it.

Other experts have expressed concern at Lansley's tactic. Professor Tim Lang, a member from the government's advisory committee on obesity, doubted the drink and food industry's ability to get a grip of itself. "In public well being, the track record of industry will never be good. Obesity is the systemic problem, and industry is locked into service plan its own narrow pastimes, " said Lang.

"I am deeply troubled to get sent signals from your secretary of state concerning working 'with business' and the any action has got to be soft 'nudge' action. "

Jeanette Longfield, head in the food campaign group sustain, said: "This is roughly the same as putting the tobacco industry responsible for smoke-free spaces. We know this 'let's all get across the table approach' doesn't work, because we've all tried using it before, including the past Conservative government. This just isn't 'big society', it's significant business. ".